Why do Yoti facial age estimation results published by NIST differ to those reported by Yoti in its white papers

profile picture Rachael Trotman 4 min read
Yoti's Facial Age Estimation results versus the NIST Age Estimation evaluation report

In September 2023, we submitted our facial age estimation model to the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), as part of a public testing process. This is the first time since 2014 that NIST has evaluated facial age estimation algorithms. NIST age estimation reports are likely to become a globally trusted performance guide for vendor models.

NIST assessed vendor Facial Age Estimation models using 4 data test sets at certain image sizes:

NIST image sizes used in the evaluation of Yoti's Facial Age Estimation

NIST provides some example images:

Fig. 5. The figure gives simulated samples of application type image used in the evaluation. Image source: Authors. Fig. 4. Examples of mugshot images used in the evaluation. Image source: NIST Special Database 32: Multiple Encounter Deceased Subjects (MEDS).

NIST note in their report that age estimation accuracy “will depend on the quality of the images” and the type of facial images captured.

For 6 years, Yoti have trained our model on primarily selfies of people looking into a mobile phone camera (or a laptop camera) because this is the obvious way customers can capture (live) their facial image to be age estimated. We capture these facial images at 720 x 800 pixels, with the face closely cropped to maximise the facial detail, because we have learned that we can attain higher age estimation accuracy for businesses by using this image size. 

We believe our training and testing on mobile phone images with closely cropped faces at 720 x 800 image size are key reasons why Yoti published MAEs (and FPRs) are lower (more accurate) for the Yoti model than the performance data published by NIST their 4 different test data sets.

Table displaying the differences in performance between the NIST evaluation results and Yoti's own testing results of Yoti's Facial Age Estimation.

NIST selected FPR objectives of 10%, 5% and 1% in their report as a way to benchmark their evaluation. As can be seen from the table above, NIST publish that Yoti’s age estimation model is more accurate on higher image size ‘Mugshot’ faces than lower image size ‘Application’ faces.  Consequently, the age thresholds required to meet FPRs of 10%, 5% and 1% are lower for Mugshot images than those needed using Application images. The age thresholds required to meet these FPR %s are lower still when the Yoti model is estimating age from mobile phone captured, higher image size, facial images. 

NIST used over 11 million facial images (with verified age) to test vendors. Some readers may wonder why NIST did not also test vendors with a test set of mobile phone camera facial images given, this is how most images will be captured for online age estimation.

The reality is that it is very challenging to capture, with consent, a database of millions of mobile phone facial images with ground truth date of birth evidence from individuals representative of many countries across the world.

Yoti is fortunate to have a very large set of consented and anonymised facial images, verified to government issued age data, from Yoti app users. By separating out ~120,000 of these images as diverse test data across each year of age, from the many millions of images used to train our algorithm, we have confidence in the accuracy figures we publish in our white paper (based primarily on mobile phone facial images at 720 x 800 pixels).

As part of our document authenticity in our identity verification service we compare the age estimation result of the selfie with the real age from their document, which also helps us test the accuracy of the model.

Finally Yoti’s facial age estimation model was first tested for accuracy, and positively certified, in November 2020 by ACCS, a UK accredited testing agency. Our age estimation model is used by some of the largest online brands, including Meta and OnlyFans, both of whom have publicly stated that it works very well.

Keep reading

Synthetic identity fraud is committed by the theft of a real piece of persoanl information such as an SSN, and combined with false information to make up an entirely synthetic identity that often bypasses traditional checks

What is synthetic identity fraud? How it works and how to prevent it

What is synthetic identity fraud? Synthetic identities are fake identities, built by combining real and made-up information, earning them the nickname “Frankenstein IDs” due to their pieced-together nature. Synthetic identity fraud is different to traditional identity fraud as it doesn’t involve an obvious, immediate consumer victim. These fake profiles are designed to mimic real customers, often slipping past traditional fraud detection systems because they don’t raise typical red flags. As a result, the primary victims of synthetic identity fraud are businesses and lenders, who bear the financial losses.   How synthetic identities are created and used

8 min read
Graphic depicting the balance security and user experience with robust authentication methods such as MFA, biometrics and passwordless, versus a traditional username and password

Beyond passwords: exploring modern authentication methods for secure login

As online threats grow more sophisticated, the way we authenticate users needs to evolve. This blog explores the modern authentication methods which can support or replace passwords, such as biometrics and verified digital IDs, and how businesses can use them to protect accounts, reduce fraud and build trust with users.   What is authentication? Authentication is the process of verifying that someone is who they say they are, typically before granting them access to a service or system. Traditionally, this has involved entering a username and password, something only the user should know.   Are passwords enough to keep

6 min read

Under the hood of facial age estimation

Since the UK Online Safety Act came into force on Friday 25th July, there has been a lot of discussion about how effective age checks are.  Facial age estimation has been approved by Ofcom as a high assurance method for online age checks. It’s a quick, private and effective way to confirm if someone is above or below an age threshold.  Each facial age estimation is quick and simple – taking around one second. This has sparked conversation when talking to businesses, press, regulators and governments – one of the most striking comments we’ve heard when showing them the

3 min read