The Supreme Court rules in favour of age verification

profile picture Yoti 3 min read
An image of the Yoti logo. Underneath reads "Yoti responds to the Supreme Court decision on Free Speech Coalition vs Paxton".

The question of whether states can require age checks on adult websites has reached a turning point in the US courts.

In Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the case challenged Texas’s H.B. 1181 law, which required commercial websites that publish sexually explicit content to verify the ages of their visitors to prevent minors from accessing pornography. One of the big discussion points has been whether, in 2025, it is still too burdensome for US adults to prove age privately compared to 20 years ago – especially when privacy-preserving age verification tools have advanced significantly. 

The Supreme Court has upheld the law, stating it only incidentally burdens adult access to pornography, finding it to be a legitimate child protection measure rather than a violation of free speech. Under this ruling, adults will still be able to access adult content online – but only after verifying their age, which is a common practice in various age-restricted contexts.

Julie Dawson, Chief Regulatory and Policy Officer at Yoti said, “Today the United States Supreme Court recognized that the online world needs to follow the same rules that apply to brick-and-mortar stores, especially when it comes to pornography. The Texas law before the court, which required commercial websites that publish sexually explicit content to verify the ages of their visitors, was upheld as constitutionally permissible, and states have the power to require age verification to prevent children from accessing sexually explicit content.

We welcome this landmark decision, which not only affirms the constitutionality of age verification laws like HB 1181, but also acknowledges how far age assurance technology has come: it is now fast, accessible, privacy-preserving, and legal in the United States.

As more US states and international jurisdictions consider online safety regulation, this judgment is likely to have a ripple effect far beyond Texas. 

Effective age assurance is now an essential tool for creating safer digital environments. Well-designed systems uphold age requirements and enable age-appropriate design – all without restricting lawful adult access or compromising user privacy. In many cases, users can simply share an age band like ‘over 18’ without revealing any personal details.

Age assurance is no longer theoretical. It is tried, tested, and widely adopted – with over a billion age checks taking place annually across the globe. 

We encourage other lawmakers to consider the Supreme Court’s judgement and explore privacy-first approaches to online safety. With thoughtful regulation and proven technology, we can protect children, preserve privacy, and foster trust in the digital world.”

*****

Online age checks are not about excluding people from accessing legal content. It’s about protecting children from seeing content that’s inappropriate for their age. So adults will be able to safely access age-restricted content, whilst protecting their privacy. 

Yoti offers effective, privacy-preserving tools like facial age estimation, Digital ID wallets, and reusable age tokens. These allow users to prove just their age, such as over 18, without sharing their identity or any other personal details. 

Get in touch to find out more about our privacy-first age solutions. 

Keep reading

person using phone

Updates to the UK MLRs have just changed the game for digital identity

For years, the UK has talked about digital identity as the key to faster onboarding, reduced fraud, better customer experiences, and stronger compliance. And yet, in much of regulated industry, the day-to-day reality has barely shifted. Why? Because compliance culture doesn’t move on optimism. It moves on defensible certainty. Until now, most compliance officers have been understandably risk-averse. Not because they dislike digital identity, but because they know what happens when a control fails: remediation programmes, supervisory challenge, awkward audit findings and reputational consequences.  Even when the Joint Money Laundering Steering Group (JMLSG) referenced digital identity in June 2020,

8 min read
A Guide to Italy’s ARCOM regulations for age verification

A guide to Italy’s AGCOM new age verification regulations for adult content

Italy’s new AGCOM regulations for adult content, which come into effect on 12th November, emphasise two key points.  The verifier must not know which platform or site for which the check will be used. The content provider must not obtain identifying personal data of the user, only a result like: ‘user is over 18’. This is known as the double blind method – ARGOM use the term double anonymity.  Secondly, verification must be robust and each session, or visit, must be age-checked. ‘One and done’ age checks are not sufficient for repeat visits. Even if a user creates an

4 min read
Italy's AGCOM age verification

Italy’s new age verification regulation for online platforms

In May 2025, AGCOM, Italy’s Communications authority, adopted Resolution No. 96/25/CONS, which formally approves the rules for online age verification of users accessing adult content. Similar to the UK’s OFCOM and France’s ARCOM regulators, AGCOM requires websites with pornographic content to implement robust age verification checks for users to ensure they are over 18. All three regulations are designed to protect minors from accessing age restricted content.  Italy’s AGCOM has specified two important requirements: Checks must be double blind – that is, age verification providers cannot see what platform is submitting the check, and the platform cannot see any

2 min read