Italy’s new age verification regulation for online platforms

profile picture Matt Prendergast 2 min read

In May 2025, AGCOM, Italy’s Communications authority, adopted Resolution No. 96/25/CONS, which formally approves the rules for online age verification of users accessing adult content.

Similar to the UK’s OFCOM and France’s ARCOM regulators, AGCOM requires websites with pornographic content to implement robust age verification checks for users to ensure they are over 18. All three regulations are designed to protect minors from accessing age restricted content. 

Italy’s AGCOM has specified two important requirements:

  1. Checks must be double blind – that is, age verification providers cannot see what platform is submitting the check, and the platform cannot see any personal information of the customer.
  2. Age verification providers should not be owned by adult operators.

AGCOM have approved Yoti’s Digital ID as a double blind age assurance solution. We have seen widescale adoption of Yoti’s Digital ID in France, where ARCOM, the French regulator, approved the Yoti Digital ID for double blind age assurance. 

Yoti ensures user privacy by:

  • Double Anonymity by Design: The only information shared by an individual is whether they are over or under 18. Nothing about an individual’s identity is revealed. 
  • Anonymous for platforms: Each age check stands alone. Businesses can’t link one check to another or tell if the same person has verified before.
  • Anonymous for provider: The Yoti ID Wallet doesn’t know which business is requesting an age verification.

Yoti Digital ID is convenient for individuals and is a practical solution for businesses using Yoti’s age verification services. For more information please contact us here.

Keep reading

A guide to Italy’s AGCOM new age verification regulations for adult content

Italy’s new AGCOM regulations for adult content, which come into effect on 12th November, emphasise two key points.  The verifier must not know which platform or site for which the check will be used. The content provider must not obtain identifying personal data of the user, only a result like: ‘user is over 18’. This is known as the double blind method – ARGOM use the term double anonymity.  Secondly, verification must be robust and each session, or visit, must be age-checked. ‘One and done’ age checks are not sufficient for repeat visits. Even if a user creates an

5 min read
An image of a man and a women, sitting in an office setting and looking at a laptop.

UK Government to formally recognise digital identities in new MLR guidance

In a major policy development, the UK Government has announced new guidance that will formally recognise certified digital identities as valid tools for complying with the UK’s Money Laundering Regulations (MLRs). HM Treasury and the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology (DSIT) made the announcement last month as part of a wider consultation response on Money Laundering Regulations. The public consultation had nearly 200 industry responses, from sectors including finance, tech, regulators and civil society. It aims to resolve longstanding uncertainty over how regulated firms can use digital identity services to meet anti‑money laundering (AML) and customer due diligence

6 min read
An image of the Yoti logo. Underneath reads "Yoti responds to the Supreme Court decision on Free Speech Coalition vs Paxton".

The Supreme Court rules in favour of age verification

The question of whether states can require age checks on adult websites has reached a turning point in the US courts. In Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the case challenged Texas’s H.B. 1181 law, which required commercial websites that publish sexually explicit content to verify the ages of their visitors to prevent minors from accessing pornography. One of the big discussion points has been whether, in 2025, it is still too burdensome for US adults to prove age privately compared to 20 years ago – especially when privacy-preserving age verification tools have advanced significantly.  The Supreme Court has upheld

3 min read